Grade: 7-12Subject:
English Language Arts, U.S. History
Number of Activities: 3
The incarceration of Japanese Americans in World War II was a grave failure of our democracy
and highlights the dangers that can result when the three branches of government failed to
uphold the Constitution and certain communities are excluded from political power. Until the
1950s, Asian Americans were not allowed to become naturalized citizens and did not have the
power to vote or engage in many of America’s political processes. In this lesson, students
will investigate how citizenship and voting rights have evolved throughout history and reflect
critically on how the rights and privileges conferred by citizenship impact political power on
both an individual and community level.
Students will:
- Discuss the dangers that can result when the three branches of government fail to uphold the Constitution
- Discuss what it takes to prevent that from happening again
- Discuss how to defend democracy
- Discuss access to voting rights and citizenship
- Recognize the connection between citizenship and political power within our government system
- Investigate how Asian Americans and other groups gained the right to vote and citizenship in America
On the morning of December 7, 1941, Japan conducted a surprise military attack on the United
States naval base at Pearl Harbor in Hawaiʻi, killing 2,403 people including U.S. personnel and
civilians. The attack also badly damaged naval vessels, battleships and aircraft. This event
ushered the United States into World War II, with the United States formally declaring war
the following day.
In the aftermath of this attack, some Americans developed unfounded fears about their fellow Japanese
American citizens and what they might do to sabotage America’s efforts in World War II. On February 19,
1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, an order that forced all Americans of
Japanese descent into internment camps. In March 1942, Congress passed Public Law 77-503 that allowed for
fining and imprisonment of those that did not comply with internment orders. All in all,110,000 Japanese
Americans - 79,000 who were American citizens - were incarcerated, leaving behind their homes, their businesses,
their livelihoods.
Despite their American citizenship, Japanese Americans’ constitutional rights were not recognized. Their loss
of rights and freedoms included, but were not limited to: right to be informed of the charges; right to
legal counsel; right to speedy and public trial; freedom from cruel and unusual punishment; and right to
equal protection under the laws.
On May 30, 1942, Japanese American citizen Fred T. Korematsu was arrested for violating Executive Order
9066 after refusing to go to the government’s internment camps. He ultimately appealed his case all the
way to the Supreme Court, challenging the legality of the Executive Order.
The Supreme Court upheld Korematsu’s conviction by a ruling of 6 - 3, declaring that the incarceration
was not caused by racism and that this was justified. Writing for the majority was Justice Hugo Black
who wrote that "all legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights of a single racial group are
immediately suspect" and not all such restrictions are inherently unconstitutional. "Pressing public
necessity may sometimes justify the existence of such restrictions; racial antagonism never can."
In a strongly worded dissent by Justice Robert Jackson wrote, “Korematsu was born on our soil, of parents
born in Japan. The Constitution makes him a citizen of the United States by nativity, and a citizen of
California by residence. No claim is made that he is not loyal to this country. There is no suggestion that,
apart from the matter involved here, he is not law-abiding and well disposed. Korematsu, however, has been
convicted of an act not commonly a crime. It consists merely of being present in the state whereof he is a
citizen, near the place where he was born, and where all his life he has lived." Jackson considered this the
legalization of racism that violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. “The Court for
all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination… The principle then lies about like a loaded weapon,
ready for the hand of any authority that can bring forward a plausible claim of an urgent need.”
The Court’s decision was widely criticized by many civil libertarians at the time. And although Korematsu lost
the 1944 Supreme Court case, he went on to become a civil rights hero and helped to spur the redress movement
for Japanese Americans. The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 contained a formal apology and in the case Trump v. Hawaii
(2018), the Supreme Court’s ruling essentially rejected and overturned the Korematsu decision.
- How did the Japanese American internment camps come about?
- How did the U.S. government violate the civil rights of its citizens?
- How would you summarize the dissenting opinion of Justice Robert Jackson on Korematsu v. the United States?
- What lessons can we learn from the Japanese American experience in World War II?
- How can we protect our democracy and prevent something like the Japanese American incarceration from happening again?
Activity 1:
Constitutional Rights
In 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, an order that forced all Americans of Japanese descent into internment camps. We will use this activity to explore what Constitutional Rights were violated.
Randomly assign students one of the following amendments. Have each student research their assigned amendment, writing down what it says and what it means in plain terms. Then have the students research in what ways were Japanese Americans rights violated in regards to the assigned amendment.
Amendments to assign for this activity:
- 1st Amendment: Freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly and petition
- 4th Amendment: Protects people from unreasonable and unlawful search and seizure of property
- 5th Amendment: Prohibits a person from answering for a crime, without legal procedure. Persons cannot be denied due process of the law
- 6th Amendment: Right to a lawyer
- 8th Amendment: Right to reasonable bail and freedom from cruel and unusual punishment
- 13th Amendment: Freedom from slavery and involuntary servitude
- 14th Amendment: Right to equal protection
- 15th Amendment: Right to vote
When all students have completed the activity, have students hang up their results in groupings by amendments. Invite students to view the completed work and facilitate a discussion.
- What historical events, national sentiment and lack of political leadership led to Executive Order 9066?
- Why are constitutional rights and freedom important, and how do we ensure that they are protected for everyone?
- In your opinion, could something like the incarceration of Japanese Americans happen again today? Why do you feel this way?
- We’ve read about Fred Korematsu. What other things could average citizens have done to affect change and get Japanese Americans their rights back?
Activity 2: Mind Mapping and Hexagonal Thinking
This activity consists of two components to help students think about the relationship between citizenship, political power, and Japanese American incarceration during WWII. The students will first create a mind map about several key words and phrases. Then the students will create Hexagonal Thinking structures to discuss the connections and relationships between these concepts.
Part I: Mind Mapping
After viewing the film clip and reading the background essay, distribute sheets of paper and markers to students. In groups of 3-4 students, ask the students to write the following words/phrases in the center of each piece of paper:
Words and Phrases:
- Democracy
- Japanese American incarceration
- Citizenship
- Right to Vote
- Voter Suppression
In small groups, ask students to free-associate and write words that come to mind with these concepts or phrases at the center of the paper. This activity should take no more than 10 minutes. Encourage students to include what they saw or read in the background film clip and essay, as well as draw from their own personal knowledge. Example below:
After students have finished their mind maps in small groups, conduct a discussion with the following questions:
- What words did you put on your mind map for each concept/phrase?
- Why did you include these words? What made you think of them?
- How do you think these concepts/phrases relate to each other?
Part II: Hexagonal Thinking
Distribute the five words/phrases (Democracy, Japanese American Incarceration, Citizenship, Right to Vote, Voter Suppression) on five different hexagonal cards.
Distribute each group of six cards to each small group. Have the students arrange them in ways that they think the words connect.
When introducing this activity to the class, you may say:
- You have a set of hexagons with the five words that we have been exploring in class.
- You will be organizing these cards as a group with cards touching those that are connected with others in some way.
- There is no right or wrong way for how you will organize these cards, and everyone will have a different arrangement.
- Have a conversation in your small group about how or why the different ideas connect. As you agree on connected ideas, arrange your hexagons to touch where they connect.
After each group completes their Hexagonal Thinking activity, ask each group to report out to the larger class. As a class, conduct a discussion around the following questions:
- How are these concepts related to each other, based on your Hexagonal Thinking cards?
- How might these concepts reinforce each other, and in what ways?
- How does Japanese American incarceration relate to the other concepts?
- How do these Hexagonal Thinking cards make you think about American democracy? What parts of our democracy are particularly important to creating a just and fair society? Why?
Activity 3: Timeline of Voting Rights
Voting in a democracy is a citizen's opportunity to participate in the democratic system. In this activity, students will create a timeline of U.S. history to learn about the history of enfranchisement in the United States.
As homework or an in-class assignment, assign each student one of the following events or topics to conduct independent research, with a focus on how these events changed who obtained 1) citizenship and 2) the right to vote.
Events:
- Declaration of Independence (1776)
- U.S. Constitution (1789)
- 14th Amendment (1868)
- 15th Amendment (1870)
- Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882
- 19th Amendment (1920)
- Immigration Act of 1924, also known as the Johnson–Reed Act
- Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran–Walter Act
- Voting Rights Act of 1965
- Voting and representation in Puerto Rico
- Voting and representation in Washington D.C.
Timeline Activity:
- Create a large timeline using poster paper or butcher paper that can be stretched out across a large flat surface, such as a whiteboard.
- The timeline should start with the founding of the nation and end with today.
- Ask students to team up with others who researched the same event/law and create an entry for that event on the timeline.
- Each entry should include a short description of how the event or law changed voting rights or citizenship. Remind students that even if their topic did not specifically address voting (e.g., the immigration acts), they should still include the event and mention how citizenship or immigration was affected.
After the timeline activity is complete, walk through the timeline as a classroom, reviewing the different events. Ask students to take a look at the entire timeline and see how it all fits together. Conduct a conversation by asking the following questions:
- Who had the right to vote at the very beginning of the timeline? Who didn’t?
- Who had the right to citizenship throughout different parts of American history? Who didn’t?
- How did immigration laws prevent voting access for Asian Americans? What about other groups of people?
- What does this timeline tell you about how political power has changed in our democracy?
California Common Core Standards Addressed
National Standards for Civics and Government
Grades: 5-8 II.A.1
Students should be able to explain the essential ideas of American constitutional government.
Grades: 5-8 II.A.1.4
Explain how specific provisions of the United States Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, limit the powers of government in order to protect the rights of individuals, e.g., habeas corpus; trial by jury; ex post facto; freedom of religion, speech, press, and assembly; equal protection of the law; due process of law; right to counsel
Grades: 5-8 II.A.1.5.a
Evaluate, take, and defend positions on current issues involving constitutional protection of individual rights, such as limits on speech, e.g., "hate speech," advertising, libel and slander, "fighting words"
Grades: 5-8 II.D.2
Students should be able to evaluate, take, and defend positions on issues in which fundamental values and principles are in conflict.
Grades: 5-8 V.A.1.1.c
Explain the important characteristics of citizenship in the United States. Specifically, citizenship confers equal rights under the law
Grades: 5-8 V.A.1.1.e
Explain the important characteristics of citizenship in the United States. Specifically, citizenship confers certain rights and privileges, e.g., the right to vote, to hold public office, to serve on juries
Grades: 5-8 V.B.1
Students should be able to evaluate, take, and defend positions on issues involving personal rights.
Grades: 5-8 V.B.2
Students should be able to evaluate, take, and defend positions on issues involving political rights.
Grades: 5-8 V.B.4
Students should be able to evaluate, take, and defend positions on issues regarding the proper scope and limits of rights.
Grades: 5-8 V.B.5
Identify and evaluate positions on a contemporary conflict between rights and other social values and interests, e.g., the right of the public to know what their government is doing versus the need for national security, the right to property versus the protection of the environment
Grades: 9-12 II.A.1.5
Explain how various provisions of the Constitution and principles of the constitutional system are devices to insure an effective government that will not exceed its limits
Grades: 9-12 II.D.3
Students should be able to evaluate, take, and defend positions on what the fundamental values and principles of American political life are and their importance to the maintenance of constitutional democracy.
Grades: 9-12 II.D.5
Students should be able to evaluate, take, and defend positions about issues concerning the disparities between American ideals and realities.
Grades: 9-12 V.A.1.1.c
Explain the idea that citizenship confers equal rights under the law
Grades: 9-12 V.A.1.1.e
Explain the idea that citizenship confers certain rights and privileges, e.g., the right to vote, to hold public office, to serve on juries
Grades: 9-12 V.B.1
Students should be able to evaluate, take, and defend positions on issues regarding personal rights.
Grades: 9-12 V.B.2
Students should be able to evaluate, take, and defend positions on issues regarding political rights.
Grades: 9-12 V.B.5
Students should be able to evaluate, take, and defend positions on issues regarding the proper scope and limits of rights.
Grades: 9-12 V.B.5.4
Evaluate positions on contemporary conflicts between rights, e.g., the right to a fair trial and the right to a free press, the right to privacy and the right to freedom of expression, one person's right to free speech versus another's right to be heard.
National Standards for History
U.S. History Grades 5-12 8.3C
The student understands the effects of World War II at home.
U.S. History Grades 5-12 8.3C.4
Evaluate the internment of Japanese Americans during the war and assess the implication for civil liberties. [Evaluate the implementation of a decision]
U.S. History Grades 5-12 10.2E.4
Evaluate the continuing grievances of racial and ethnic minorities and their recurrent reference to the nation’s charter documents. [Explain historical continuity and change]
College- and Career-Readiness Anchor Standards
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.1
Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.2
Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.3
Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of a text.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.4
Interpret words and phrases as they are used in a text, including determining technical, connotative, and figurative meanings, and analyze how specific word choices shape meaning or tone.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.6
Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.7
Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.8
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.9
Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.2
Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.4
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.8
Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and integrate the information while avoiding plagiarism.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.9
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.SL.1
Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.SL.2
Integrate and evaluate information presented in diverse media and formats, including visually, quantitatively, and orally.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.SL.4
Present information, findings, and supporting evidence such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.L.1
Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking.
Grades 6-8:
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.6.3
Analyze in detail how a key individual, event, or idea is introduced, illustrated, and elaborated in a text (e.g., through examples or anecdotes).
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.7.3
Analyze the interactions between individuals, events, and ideas in a text (e.g., how ideas influence individuals or events, or how individuals influence ideas or events).
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.8.3
Analyze how a text makes connections among and distinctions between individuals, ideas, or events (e.g., through comparisons, analogies, or categories).
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6-8.2
Write informative/explanatory texts to examine a topic and convey ideas, concepts, and information through the selection, organization, and analysis of relevant content.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6-8.4
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6-8.8
Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources; assess the credibility of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and providing basic bibliographic information for sources.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.6-8.9
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6-8.1
Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 6-8 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6-8.1.a
Come to discussions prepared, having read or studied required material; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas under discussion.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6-8.1.c
Pose and respond to specific questions with elaboration and detail by making comments that contribute to the topic, text, or issue under discussion.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6-8.2
Interpret information presented in diverse media and formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) and explain how it contributes to a topic, text, or issue under study.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6-8.4
Present claims and findings, sequencing ideas logically and using pertinent descriptions, facts, and details to accentuate main ideas or themes; use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.L.6-8.1
Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.1
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.2
Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary of the source distinct from prior knowledge or opinions.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.4
Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including vocabulary specific to domains related to history/social studies.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.7
Integrate visual information (e.g., in charts, graphs, photographs, videos, or maps) with other information in print and digital texts.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.8
Distinguish among fact, opinion, and reasoned judgment in a text.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.9
Analyze the relationship between a primary and secondary source on the same topic.
Grades 9-10:
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.9-10.2
Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary of how key events or ideas develop over the course of the text.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.9-10.8
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.2
Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.4
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.8
Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the usefulness of each source in answering the research question; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.9
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.9-10.1
Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9–10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.9-10.1.a
Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well-reasoned exchange of ideas.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.9-10.1.c
Propel conversations by posing and responding to questions that relate the current discussion to broader themes or larger ideas; actively incorporate others into the discussion; and clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.9-10.2
Integrate multiple sources of information presented in diverse media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.9-10.4
Present information, findings, and supporting evidence clearly, concisely, and logically such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and task.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.L.9-10.1
Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.9-10.1
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.9-10.3
Analyze in detail a series of events described in a text; determine whether earlier events caused later ones or simply preceded them.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.9-10.4
Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including vocabulary describing political, social, or economic aspects of history/social studies.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.9-10.7
Integrate quantitative or technical analysis (e.g., charts, research data) with qualitative analysis in print or digital text.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.9-10.9
Compare and contrast treatments of the same topic in several primary and secondary sources.
Grades 11-12:
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.11-12.7
Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words in order to address a question or solve a problem.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.11-12.2
Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.11-12.4
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.11-12.8
Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the task, purpose, and audience; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and overreliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.11-12.9
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.11-12.1
Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 11–12 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.11-12.1.a
Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well-reasoned exchange of ideas.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.11-12.1.c
Propel conversations by posing and responding to questions that probe reasoning and evidence; ensure a hearing for a full range of positions on a topic or issue; clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions; and promote divergent and creative perspectives.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.11-12.1.d
Respond thoughtfully to diverse perspectives; synthesize comments, claims, and evidence made on all sides of an issue; resolve contradictions when possible; and determine what additional information or research is required to deepen the investigation or complete the task.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.11-12.2
Integrate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) in order to make informed decisions and solve problems, evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source and noting any discrepancies among the data.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.11-12.4
Present information, findings, and supporting evidence, conveying a clear and distinct perspective, such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning, alternative or opposing perspectives are addressed, and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and a range of formal and informal tasks.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.11-12.1
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.11-12.2
Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary that makes clear the relationships among the key details and ideas.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.11-12.3
Evaluate various explanations for actions or events and determine which explanation best accords with textual evidence, acknowledging where the text leaves matters uncertain.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.11-12.4
Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including analyzing how an author uses and refines the meaning of a key term over the course of a text (e.g., how Madison defines faction in Federalist No. 10).
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.11-12.8
Evaluate an author’s premises, claims, and evidence by corroborating or challenging them with other information.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.11-12.9
Integrate information from diverse sources, both primary and secondary, into a coherent understanding of an idea or event, noting discrepancies among sources.